OCIPLA OCIPLA OCIPLA
  • Home
  • About
    • About OCIPLA
    • Committees
    • Past Presidents
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • News
  • Membership
  • Contact
OCIPLA OCIPLA
  • Home
  • About
    • About OCIPLA
    • Committees
    • Past Presidents
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • News
  • Membership
  • Contact

Federal Circuit Summaries (1 of 10)

Inventors, Not Ai-Ventors: The Patent Act Requires an “Inventor” to be a Natural Person In Thaler v. Vidal, Appeal No. 21-2347, the Federal Circuit held that under the Patent Act... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (2 of 10)

University Successfully Argues Prior Art’s Disclosures Were Not “by Another” In Lsi Corporation v. Regents Of The University Of Minnesota, Appeal No. 21-2057, the Federal Circuit held that determining whether... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (3 of 10)

An ANDA Specification that Directly Addresses Issues of Infringement Controls the Infringement Inquiry In Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Eagle Pharmaceticals, Inc. Appeal No.  22-145, the Federal Circuit held that an... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (4 of 10)

Missing Experience Undermines Expert’s Rebuttal of Obviousness Arguments In Best Medical International, Inc. v. Elekta Inc., Appeal No. 21-2099, the Federal Circuit held that Expert testimony was properly discounted when... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (5 of 10)

Expert Testimony That Contradicts Patent Specification Fails to Create a Genuine Issue of Fact In Caredx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., Appeal No. 22-1027, the Federal Circuit held that expert testimony... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (6 of 10)

Claims With Clerical Errors Can Be Judicially Corrected and Willfully Infringed Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Appeal No. 21-1834, the Federal Circuit held that a court can... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (7 of 10)

 Justice Must Satisfy the Appearance of Justice— A Judge’s Family’s Financial Interest of 100 Shares of a Party’s Stock is a Serious Issue Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.,... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (8 of 10)

Somebody’s Wrong:  PTAB Must Resolve Conflicting Factual Testimony During IPR  In Google LLC v. IPA Technologies Inc., Appeal No. 21-1179, the Federal Circuit held that, for purposes of determining whether... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (9 of 10)

Commissioner’s Exercise of Vacant Director’s Duties Does Not Violate Appointments Clause Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Appeal No. 18-2140 Before Moore, Reyna, and Chen.  Appeal from the Patent... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized

Federal Circuit Summaries (10 of 10)

The Heightened Standard of Proving Induced Infringement Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC, Appeal No. 21-1609, the Federal Circuit held that a finding of induced infringement requires knowledge... read more →
  • September 21, 2022
  • staff
  • Uncategorized
  • 1
  • 2

Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • Federal Circuit Summaries (1 of 8)
  • Federal Circuit Summaries (2 of 8)
  • Federal Circuit Summaries (3 of 8)
  • Federal Circuit Summaries (4 of 8)
  • Federal Circuit Summaries (5 of 8)

Archives

  • January 2023
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • March 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • October 2016

Categories

  • Amicus Briefs
  • Copyright
  • Education and Training
  • Employment
  • Federal Circuit Summary
  • News
  • Non-Obviousness
  • Patent
  • Patent Trial and Appeal Board
  • Trade secret
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized


Serving the Orange County Intellectual Property law community since 1983.

Orange County Intellectual Property Law Association
P.O. Box 7632
Newport Beach, CA 92658

About
Membership
Bylaws
Contact

© 2022 OCIPLA | All Rights Reserved | Website design by SafeHouse Web