OCIPLA OCIPLA OCIPLA
  • Home
  • About
    • About OCIPLA
    • Committees
    • Past Presidents
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • News
  • Membership
  • Contact
OCIPLA OCIPLA
  • Home
  • About
    • About OCIPLA
    • Committees
    • Past Presidents
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • News
  • Membership
  • Contact
Apr 06

DISTRICT COURT & PTAB HAPPENINGS

USPTO Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) Addresses What Evidence Is Required to Establish That a Reference Qualifies as a “Printed Publication” at the Institution Stage  by Melissa R. Gibson & C. Brandon Rash Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Inter Partes Review January 2, 2020 On December 20, 2019, the Precedential Opinion... read more →
  • April 6, 2020
  • staff
  • Patent
Apr 06

Internet Sightings

by Frederic M. Douglas and James E. Hawes This column highlights some of the more notable recent online notices, newsletters, and blogs dealing with IP prosecution issues. Patently-O – a blog written by Dennis Crouch – www.patentlyo.com. ▪ On February 25, 2020, Professor Crouch discussed a Federal Circuit opinion, HZNP Finance... read more →
  • April 6, 2020
  • staff
  • Patent
Feb 01

FEDERAL CIRCUIT SUMMARIES

  Patentee’s Lexicography Negates Infringement Despite Defendant’s Use of Claim Term in Product Literature In Plastic Omnium Advanced Innovation and Research v. Donghee America, Inc., Appeal No. 18-2087, the patentee’s lexicography of “parison” excluded the allegedly infringing product even though the alleged infringer’s product literature specifically described a “parison.” Plastic... read more →
  • February 1, 2020
  • staff
  • Federal Circuit Summary, Patent
Feb 01

DISTRICT COURT & PTAB HAPPENINGS

Patent Owner Precluded from Asserting in Litigation Claims Obtained Through Ex Parte Reexamination by Matthew George Hartman & Rubén H. Muñoz District Court, Infringement, Inter Partes Review, Northern District of California October 21, 2019 A district court has denied a request to amend patent infringement contentions to add claims obtained... read more →
  • February 1, 2020
  • staff
  • Patent
Feb 01

INTERNET SIGHTINGS

by Frederic M. Douglas and James E. Hawes This column highlights some of the more notable recent online notices, newsletters, and blogs dealing with IP prosecution issues. IPWatchdog – a patent law blog – IPwatchdog.com ▪ On January 3, 2020, a post by Gene Quinn announced that the USPTO has now... read more →
  • February 1, 2020
  • staff
  • Patent
Sep 30

FEDERAL CIRCUIT SUMMARIES – September 2019

Contributors: Knobbe Martens Mere Potential for Future Appeal Does Not Prevent Triggering Estoppel of Inter Partes Reexamination When Party Fails to Seek Relief in the First Instance In Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc., Appeal Nos. 2017-1591, -1592, -1593, the Federal Circuit determined that failure to petition for certiorari on the... read more →
  • September 30, 2019
  • staff
  • Federal Circuit Summary, Patent
Sep 30
Courtroom

DISTRICT COURT AND PTAB HAPPENINGS – September 2019

Contributors: Akin Gump Judge Gilstrap Issues Standing Order Governing Subject Matter Eligibility Contentions  by Jason Weil & Charles Everingham IV Patent Trial and Appeal Board, 35 U.S.C. § 102, 35 U.S.C. § 103, Eastern District of Texas For nearly two decades, the Eastern District of Texas has been a hotbed... read more →
  • September 30, 2019
  • staff
  • Patent
Sep 30

INTERNET SIGHTINGS – September 2019

Internet Sightings by Frederic M. Douglas and James E. Hawes This column highlights some of the more notable recent online notices, newsletters, and blogs dealing with IP prosecution issues. IPWatchdog – a patent law blog – IPwatchdog.com * On August 30, 2019, a post discussed the Federal Circuit opinion relating to... read more →
  • September 30, 2019
  • staff
  • Uncategorized
Sep 02

FEDERAL CIRCUIT SUMMARIES – August / September 2019

Metadata Could Help Independently Corroborate Inventor Testimony of Prior Conception In Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children’s Products, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2018-1259, 2018-1260, inventor testimony of prior conception must be independently corroborated. Kolcraft owns two design patents directed to children’s play equipment.  Graco petitioned for inter partes review challenging both... read more →
  • September 2, 2019
  • staff
  • Federal Circuit Summary, Patent
Sep 02
Courtroom

DISTRICT COURT AND PTAB HAPPENINGS – August / September 2019

Contributors: Akin Gump PTAB: Informal Delivery of Complaint Does Not Start One-Year Clock for Filing IPR  by Matthew George Hartman & Rubén H. Muñoz Patent Trial and Appeal Board, 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), Inter Partes Review. A Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) panel has determined that emailing... read more →
  • September 2, 2019
  • staff
  • Patent
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • ...
  • 9

« Previous Page — Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • Federal Circuit Summaries
  • District Court & PTAB Happenings
  • Internet Sightings
  • OCIPLA Accepting Board Member Nominations
  • Internet Sightings

Archives

  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • October 2016

Categories

  • Amicus Briefs
  • Employment
  • Federal Circuit Summary
  • News
  • Patent
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized


Serving the Orange County Intellectual Property law community since 1983.

Orange County Intellectual Property Law Association
P.O. Box 7632
Newport Beach, CA 92658

About
Membership
Bylaws
Contact

© 2021 OCIPLA | All Rights Reserved | Website design by SafeHouse Web